Authors
- Velichkin Georgy Viktorovich
Annotation
Many citizens of the Russian Federation are not yet familiar with the concept of «inheritance contract» and are wary of its pitfalls, which will be studied below. The article
provides a detailed analysis of the characteristic features of an inheritance contract and its special conditions identified by the legislator, as well as in the course of practical application. In the process of analysis, the key parties to the contract are identified, significant elements are identified from the point of view of positive and negative factors affecting the application of this contract in civil circulation by subjects of developing relations. A search and verification of problems that participants in civil circulation may encounter is carried out. The need for legislative changes to approaches to regulating an inheritance contract is substantiated in order to popularize it among members of both a separate organization and citizens of society as a whole.
How to link insert
Velichkin, G. V. (2024). INHERITANCE AGREEMENT AS A WAY OF INHERITING CORPORATE RIGHTS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 4 (56), 99. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9113-2024-456-99-106
References
1.
1. Belootchenko E. A. Nasledstvenny`j dogovor v ramkax reformirovaniya rossijskogo nasledstvennogo prava // Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. 2017. № 2 (48). S. 122–129.
2.
2. Bessarab N. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie nasledstvennogo dogovora v Rossijskoj Federacii: aktual`ny`e problemy` i puti ix resheniya // Mezhdunarodny`j nauchno-issledovatel` skij zhurnal. 2020. № 4–2 (94). S. 78–80.
3.
3. Gusejnova A. I. Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda nasledstvennogo dogovora / A. I. Gusejnova // Zakon i pravo. 2020. № 3. S. 54–55.
4.
4. Zaxarova E. A., Voronina Yu. N., Shanazarova E. V. Perspektivy` nasledovaniya biznesa na osnovanii nasledstvennogo dogovora v Rossijskoj Federacii // European Research: sbornik statej pobeditelej VII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Penza, 7 dekabrya 2016 g.) / pod obshh. red. G. Yu. Gulyaeva. Penza: Nauka i Prosveshhenie, 2016. S. 355–358.
5.
5. Kim I. I. Aktual`ny`e problemy` primeneniya nasledstvennogo dogovora v Rossijskoj Federacii // Molodoj ucheny`j. 2022. № 17 (412). S. 190–193.
6.
6. Korsun M. V. Problemy` primeneniya nasledstvennogo dogovora v RF // XVI korolyovskie chteniya: Mezhdunarodnaya molodezhnaya nauchnaya konferenciya, posvyashhennaya 60-letiyu poleta v kosmos Yu. A. Gagarina: sbornik materialov (5–7 okt. 2021 g.): v 3 t. T. 3. Samara: Samarskij nacional`ny`j issledovatel`skij universitet imeni akademika S. P. Korolyova, 2021. S. 1276–1277.
7.
7. Kravchuk A. A. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie podxody` k ponimaniyu sushhnosti kategorii «korporaciya» // Vestnik MGPU. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2023. № 3 (51). C. 81–94.
8.
8. Prokop`eva I. O. Osnovny`e problemy` nasledstvennogo dogovora // Molodoj ucheny`j. 2019. № 48 (286). S. 286–288.
9.
9. Sitdikova L. B., Starodumova S. Yu. K voprosu o merax otvetstvennosti i sposobax zashhity` pri narushenii ili neispolnenii uslovij korporativnogo dogovora // Yuridicheskij mir. 2021. № 11. S. 48–52.
10.
10. Sitdikova L. B., Starodumova S. Yu. Nasledovanie korporativny`x prav // Nasledstvennoe pravo. 2019. № 1. S. 7–11.