Home страница → STATE AND LAW OF THE JOCHI ULUS (GOLDEN HORDE AND ITS HEIRS) IN LEGAL RESEARCH: TRENDS AND PROSPECTS

STATE AND LAW OF THE JOCHI ULUS (GOLDEN HORDE AND ITS HEIRS) IN LEGAL RESEARCH: TRENDS AND PROSPECTS

State and Law: Theoretical and Historical Aspects , UDC: 340.12; 340.153 DOI: 10.24412/2076-9113-2025-359-27-39

Authors

  • Pochekayev Roman Yulianovich Doctor of Sciences (History), PhD in Law, Associate Professor

Annotation

The purpose of the article is to analyze the state of legal research on the state and law of the Jochi Ulus, that is, the Golden Horde and its heirs, the Turkic-Mongolian states; to identify the reasons for the insignificant attention of jurists (legal historians) to this issue; to identify the main trends and prospects for studying the political and legal history of the Jochi Ulus from a legal point of view. The reasons why legal scholars pay little attention to the state and the law of the Jochi Ulus are the absence of a significant number of legal monuments for historical and legal analysis and the need to know the specifics of traditional Oriental law in general and Turkic-Mongolian in particular. Lacking such knowledge and often relying on the Eurocentric model of the history of the state an law, those lawyers who conduct such research make many mistakes in their research. Also, lawyers who turn to the state and the law of the Jochi Ulus often have no idea about the current state of research on its history, about the sources introduced into scientific circulation, etc. Based on the results of the study, recommendations were developed to use an interdisciplinary approach more actively, to interact with specialists in related fields (historians, orientalists, etc.), as well as to pay attention to the analysis of individual branches of law and legal monuments.
Tags:
history of state and law; traditional state and law; Jochi Ulus , legal monuments; non-legal sources
References
1. 1. Ablaeva E. B. Pravovaya sistema Kazakhstana v ordynskiy period // Lex Russica. 2019. № 10 (155). S. 141–153.
2. 2. Ametka F. A. Krymskoe khanstvo: stanovlenie i razvitie gosudarstvennosti i prava (pervaya polovina XV – vtoraya polovina XVIII v.): dis… kand. yurid. nauk. Kharkov, 2003. 185 s.
3. 3. Ametka F. A., Khavadzhi D. R. Istoriko-pravovye aspekty organizatsii i osushchestvleniya sudebnoy vlasti v Krymskom khanstve (pervaya polovina XV – vtoraya polovina XVIII vv.) // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federalnogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2019. T. 5 (71). № 4. S. 9–15.
4. 4. Bakieva G. T. Obychay i zakon: оcherki pravovoy kultury sibirskikh tatar v XVIII – nachale XX veka. Novosibirsk: Geo, 2011. 213 s.
5. 5. Belyaev I. D. O mongolskikh chinovnikakh na Rusi, upominaemykh v khanskikh yarlykakh // Arkhiv istoriko-yuridicheskikh svedeniy, otnosyashchikhsya do Rossii, izdavaemij N. Kalachovim. M.: Tipografiya A. Semena, 1850. Kn. I. S. 97–110.
6. 6. Vaniev E. S. Istoriko-pravovaya kharakteristika krymskikh sidzhiley // Vestnik Yuridicheskogo fakulteta Yuzhnogo federalnogo universiteta. 2021. T. 8. № 1. S. 9–15.
7. 7. Georgievskiy E. V. Obshchaya ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika yarlykov tatarskikh khanov russkim mitropolitam // Pravo i politika. 2017. № 2. S. 67–77.
8. 8. Gurlyand I. Ya. Yamskaya gon'ba v Moskovskom gosudarstve do kontsa XVII veka. Yaroslavl: Tip. gubernskogo pravleniya, 1900. 339 s.
9. 9. Eremyan V. V. Ordynskaya Rus (ot obshchiny-gosudarstva k udelu-votchine): v 3 t. M.: RUDN, 2015.
10. 10. Zharov S. N. Russkoe i mongolskoe zakonodatelstvo: problemy dvoezakoniya na Rusi // Rossiya i Vostok: problemy vzaimodeystviya: materialy 3 Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (29 maya – 4 iyunya 1995 g.). Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskiy gosudarstvenniy un-t, 1995. S. 42–44.
11. 11. Zhumaganbetov T. S. Ulus Dzhuchi. Gosudarstvennaya organizatsiya i pravovye otnosheniya v XIII–XV vv. (Tyurko-kypchakskie politicheskie i pravovye traditsii v srednevekovoy mongol’skoy gosudarstvennosti). Almaty: Zheti Zhargy, 2020. 367 s.
12. 12. Zimanov S. Z. Kazakhskiy sud biev — unikal'naya sudebnaya Sistema. Almaty: Atamura, 2008. 223 s.
13. 13. Zimanov S. Z. Politicheskiy stroy Kazakhstana kontsa XVIII i pervoy poloviny XIX vekov. Alma-Ata: Izd-vo Akad. nauk KazSSR, 1960. 296 s.
14. 14. Ibragimov Zh. I. Instituty mongol’skogo prava perioda Zolotoy Ordy // Rossiysko-Aziatskiy pravovoy zhurnal. 2022. № 3. S. 45–53.
15. 15. Koval V. N. Razvitie sudoproizvodstva v Krymu (period Krymskogo khanstva) // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2023. № 3. S. 48–53.
16. 16. Lappo D. E. Ob izuchenii stepnogo prava // Russkaya mysl’. T. Х. 1906. S. 36–51.
17. 17. Leontovich F. I. K istorii prava russkikh inorodtsev: Drevniy mongolo-kalmytskiy ili oyratskiy ustav vzyskaniy (Tsaadzhin-Bichik) // Zapiski Imperatorskogo Novorossiyskogo universiteta. Odessa, 1879. T. XXVIII. 262 s.
18. 18. Luchko A. I. Vliyanie tataro-mongol’skogo iga na pravovoe regulirovanie nalogovykh otnosheniy na Rusi // Trudy yuridicheskogo fakul’teta: materialy Mezhvuzovskoy studencheskoy nauch. konf. «Pravo i ekonomika: voprosy istorii i teorii» (Sankt-Peterburg, 14–15 marta 2013 g.). SPb., 2013. T. II. S. 180–186.
19. 19. Onlanbekova G. M. Istoriya razvitiya sudebnoy vlasti v period Kazakhskogo khanstva // Simvol nauki. 2016. № 2. S. 128–135.
20. 20. Ponozhenko E. A. Obshchestvenno-politicheskiy stroy Nogayskoy Ordy v XV – seredine XVII vv.: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1977. 200 s.
21. 21. Sapronova Yu. V., Yaroshenko U. A. Sud i pravosudie v Zolotoy Orde // Akademiya pedagogicheskikh idey. Novatsiya. 2018. № 6. S. 698–706.
22. 22. Sergeevich V. I. Drevnosti russkogo prava. T. III. Zemlevladenie. Tyaglo. Poryadok oblozheniya. SPb.: Tip. M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1903. 496 s.
23. 23. Sochnev Yu. V. Zolotoordynskiy pravovoy pretsedent v tsarskoy gramote 1606 g. // Narod i vlast: vzaimodeystvie v istorii i sovremennosti: nauchniy ezhegodnik fakulteta prava HSE University, Nizhniy Novgorod. Vyp. 5. Nizhniy Novgorod: HSE University – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2018. S. 126–136.
24. 24. Sochnev Yu. V. Problema opredeleniya «dan'shchikov» v yarlyke zolotoordynskogo khana Mengu-Temira // Voprosy arkhivovedeniya i istochnikovedeniya v vysshey shkole: sb. st. uchastnikov XVI Regionalnoj nauch.-prakt. konf. (13 dekabrya 2018 g.). Vyp. XV. Arzamas: Arzamasskiy filial NNGU, 2019. S. 14–19.
25. 25. Tuzmukhamedov R. A. Nekotorye mezhdunarodnye i mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty, sozdaniya, sushchestvovaniya i padeniya Zolotoy Ordy // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1995. № 1. S. 116–124.
26. 26. Fuks S. L. Ocherki istorii gosudarstva i prava kazakhov v XVIII i pervoy polovine XIX v. Astana: Yuridicheskaya kniga, 2008. 810 s.
27. 27. Tsechoev V. K. Proiskhozhdenie gosudarstva i prava narodov Dona i Severnogo Kavkaza: Antichnost' i srednevekov’e: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. Rostov na/Donu, 2004. 385 s.
28. 28. Shurguchiev O. S. Istochniki o sudoproizvodstve v Zolotoy Orde // Vestnik Kalmitskogo instituta gumanitarnikh issledovaniy RAN. 2016. T. 28. № 6. S. 128–134.
29. 29. Yakusheva Ya. Ya. Kalashnikova E. B. Sud i pravosudie v Zolotoy Orde // Nauka, obrazovanie: obshchestvo: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya: sb. materialov VI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Cheboksary, 18 iyunya 2017 g.). Cheboksary: Interaktiv plyus, 2017. S. 57–61.
30. 30. Kresin O. Law and state of Crimean Khanate (some theses) // Everything for the layer. 2016. № 168. S. 110–117.
Download file .pdf 295.23 kb