Authors
- Churilov Sergey Nikiforovich Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor
Annotation
Based on a systematic analysis and the method of dialectical contradictions, the article examines the most significant, from the point of view of the constitutional principles of legality and the presumption of innocence, accusatory legal and psychological factors prevailing in the criminal procedural activities of employees of criminal prosecution bodies and federal judges. The article substantiates the need to eliminate this type of factors by making specific legislative decisions that exclude contradictions between the purpose of criminal proceedings and the norms of the criminal procedure law regulating the activities of subjects of investigation and resolution of cases in line with the reliable establishment of the circumstances of the investigated act. The task of considering this problem also includes equipping students of the criminal law profile with knowledge about the accusatory legal and psychological factors prevailing in the criminal procedural activities of criminal justice bodies, which is important for improving the level of legal education at law faculties.
How to link insert
Churilov, S. N. (2023). ABOUT SOME ACCUSATORY LEGAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS PREVAILING IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ACTIVITY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023, №4 (52), 89. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2023.52.4.08
References
1.
1. Bezlepkin B. T. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-processual`nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejny`j). M.: Prospekt, 2021. 640 s.
2.
2. Mel`nik V. V. Iskusstvo dokazy`vaniya v sostyazatel`nom ugolovnom processe. M.: Delo, 2000. 496 s.
3.
3. Nemy`tina M. V. Mif o fundamental`nom yuridicheskom obrazovanii // Vestnik MGPU. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2011. № 2. S. 86–91.
4.
4. Pashencev D. A. Perspektivy` razvitiya vy`sshego yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya v usloviyax evrazijskoj integracii // Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. 2013. № 6. S. 29–30.
5.
5. O primenenii sudami norm Ugolovno-protsessualnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, reguliruiushchikh sudoproizvodstvo s uchastiem prisiazhnykh zasedatelei: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 22.11.2005 № 23 (red. ot 28.06.2022) URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_56702/ (data obrashcheniia 23.10.2023).
6.
6. Ob uchastii prokurorov v sudebny`x stadiyax ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: prikaz General`noj prokuratury` Rossii ot 30.06.2021 № 376. URL: https://legalacts.ru/doc/prikazgenprokuratury-rossii-ot-30062021-n-376-ob-uchastii/ (data obrashheniya 23.10.2023).
7.
7. Sviridov M. K. Ustanovlenie istiny` na predvaritel`nom rassledovanii i v sudebnom razbiratel`stve // Pravovy`e problemy` ukrepleniya rossijskoj gosudarstvennosti: sb. statej. Ch. 51. Trudy` ucheny`x TGU. Tomsk, 2011. S. 3–8.
8.
8. Xodzhaeva E. A. Sudy` prisyazhny`x v oficial`noj statistike: analiticheskij obzor / Institut problem pravoprimeneniya pri Evropejskom universitete v Sankt-Peterburge. SPb.: Evropejskij universitet v Sankt-Peterburge, 2020. 20 s.
9.
9. Churilov S. N. Predmet dokazy`vaniya kak pravovoe sredstvo zashhity` prav i zakonny` x interesov nesovershennoletnego obvinyaemogo // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2022. № 10. S. 329–333.
10.
10. E`sterle T. A. By`t` ili ne by`t` istine v ugolovnom processe? // Molodoj ucheny`j. 2023. № 2 (449). S. 359–361.