Home Releases № 1 (61)

LEGAL NATURE OF THE RIGHT OF USE A MINOR’S HOUSING AFTER THE DISSOLUTION OF THE PARENTS’ MARRIAGE

Private Law , UDC: 347.62+347.232 DOI: 10.24412/2076-9113-2026-161-85-98

Authors

  • Emelina Lyudmila Anatolyevna Candidate of Law
  • Yavorsky Sergey Anatolyevich

Annotation

The purpose of this study is to form a legal model that ensures the protection of the housing rights of a minor after the dissolution of the parents’ marriage in conditions of legal uncertainty. The article substantiates the necessity to abandon the in rem approach to the right of a child to use residential premises and to switch to an obligation-legal concept based on the parental obligation to provide living conditions. The authors propose to reform p. 4 of Article 31 of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation and Article 24 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, supplementing them with a mechanism of judicial assessment of the housing provided for its equivalence. They emphasise the priority of the child’s interests (Articles 38 and 40 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation) and the inadmissibility of formal loss of registration without the actual provision of alternative accommodation.

How to link insert

Emelina, L. A. & Yavorsky, S. A. (2026). LEGAL NATURE OF THE RIGHT OF USE A MINOR’S HOUSING AFTER THE DISSOLUTION OF THE PARENTS’ MARRIAGE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (61), 85. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9113-2026-161-85-98
References
1. 1. Gomenok A. Yu. Riski uchastiya nesovershennoletnih v sdelkah po kuple-prodazhe zhiloj nedvizhimosti // Transformatsiya prava v informatsionnom obshhestve: materialy III Vseros. nauch.-prakt. foruma molodyh uchenyh i studentov (Ekaterinburg, 26 noyabrya 2020 goda). Ekaterinburg: Ural`skij gosudarstvennyj yuridicheskij universitet, 2020. S. 218–225.
2. 2. Gul`ko O. A., Nechaeva D. P. Zashhita zhilishhnyh prav nesovershennoletnih pri rastorzhenii braka // Student goda 2024: sb. st. II Mezhdunar. nauch.-issledov. konkursa. Penza: Nauka i Prosveshhenie, 2024. S. 61–64.
3. 3. Emelina L. A. Yavorskij S. A. Aktual`nye problemy zashhity zhilishhnyh prav nesovershennoletnix // Detstvo — territoriya bezopasnosti: sb. materialov konf. (Moskva, 7 dekabrya 2023 goda). M.: Tsentr vynuzhdennyh pereselentsev «Saratovskij istochnik», 2023. S. 142–145.
4. 4. Emelina L. A. Yavorskij S. A. Otsy bez prava na otsovstvo: semejno-pravovye mehanizmy obespecheniya balansa interesov otsov i detej // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo. 2024. T. 14. № 6. S. 90–102.
5. 5. Letova N. V. Osobennosti zashhity zhilishhnyh prav detej, imeyushih spetsial`nyj pravovoj status // Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel`stve. 2019. № 1. S. 61–66.
6. 6. Pashentsev D. A. Dve modeli pravovogo regulirovaniya semejnyh otnoshenij: dorevolyutsionnyj i sovetskij opyt // Vestnik MGOU. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya. 2019. № 3. S. 60–67.
7. 7. Ul`bashev A. H. Semejnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Yurajt, 2023. 208 s.
Download file .pdf 308.55 kb