Home страница → THE EFFECT OF DECISIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BODIES ON PERSONS: INTER PARTES OR ERGA OMNES

THE EFFECT OF DECISIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BODIES ON PERSONS: INTER PARTES OR ERGA OMNES

Public Law , UDC: 341.1 DOI: 10.24412/2076-9113-2025-358-62-77

Authors

  • Ismayilov Rovshan Rahim ogly PhD in Law

Annotation

The article is devoted to the study of the action of decisions of constitutional control bodies on persons, including the distinction between the action inter partes and erga omnes. The author analyses theoretical and practical aspects of this problem, relying © Исмаилов Р. Р., 2025 on examples from the legal systems of the USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal and other countries. Special attention is paid to the influence of stare decisis in the diffuse model, as well as the concept of ‘negative legislator’, characteristic of centralised control in the countries with civil law systems. The article shows that the boundary between the above approaches is not absolute, and the specific law practice is conditioned by national peculiarities and evolution of constitutional control in different countries. The conclusions of the article emphasise the need for further study of the issue in question in the process of adapting traditional models to the realities of modern legal systems and developing on this basis more precise criteria for differentiating models of constitutional control.
Tags:
constitutional control; inter partes; erga omnes; stare decisis; centralised model; diffuse model
References
1. 1. Berezin Yu. B. Konstitucionno-pravovoj status organov konsti-tucionnogo kontrolya v evropejskix stranax: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2006. 234 р.
2. 2. Bernam W. Pravovaya sistema USA. M.: Novaya yustitsiya, 2006. 1211 р.
3. 3. Dushenko K. V., Bagrinovskij G. Yu. Bol’shoj slovar’ latinskix tsitat i vyrazhenij. M.: Azbuka-Attikus, 2017. 909 s.
4. 4. Ismailov R. R. Perspektivy` evropejskoj modeli konstitucion-nogo kontrolya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatelstva i sravnitel`nogo pravovedeniya. 2024. T. 20. № 1. S. 32–41.
5. 5. Miryasheva E. V., Pavlikov S. G., Safonov V. E. Sudebny’j konstitucionny’j kontrol’ v Rossii i zarubezhny’x stranax: istoriya i sovremennost. M.: Rossijskij gosudarstvenny universitet pravosudia, 2015. 303 s.
6. 6. Molotov A. V. Abstraktny’j i konkretny’j sudebny’j konstituci-onny’j normokontrol’ v deyatel’nosti Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Tumen, 2003. 229 s.
7. 7. Raffeiner S. «Inoj mir» gosudarstvennogo immuniteta v ger-mano-ital’yanskom spore ob immunitete gosudarstva: vozmozhnosti i prepyatstviya posle resheniya ital’yanskogo Konstitucionnogo Suda // Dajdzhest publichnogo prava. 2019. №. 1. S. 42–71.
8. 8. Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe pravo / B. N. Topornin [i dr.]. M.: Manuskript, 1996. 728 s.
9. 9. Shimanek Ya. Konstitucionnoe pravosudie postsovetskix gosudarstv na fone model’ny’x reshenij v sfere vneparlamentskogo kontrolya konstitucionnosti prava // Konstitucionnaya yusticiya v stranax Vostochnoj Evropy’: problemy’ teorii i praktiki. M.: Norma, 2019. S. 20—60.
10. 10. Amaral M., Pereira R. The Portuguese Constitutional Court // Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. S. 673–718.
11. 11. Italian constitutional justice in global context / V. Barsotti [i dr.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 324 s.
12. 12. Behrendt Ch. The Belgian Constitutional Court // Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. S. 71–117.
13. 13. Brewer-Carías A. Judicial Review in Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 432 s.
14. 14. Calamandrei P. La illegittimità costituzionale delle leggi nel processo civile. Padova: Cedam, 1950. 98 s.
15. 15. Cappelletti M., Adams J. Judicial review of legislation: European antecedents and adaptations // Harvard Law Review. 1966. Vol. 79. S. 1207–1224.
16. 16. Cappelletti M. La justicia constitucional en Italia // Boletin del lnstituto de Derecho Comparado de Mexico. 1960. Vol. 13. S. 41–57.
17. 17. Cappelletti M. Judicial review in the contemporary world. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971. 117 s.
18. 18. da Silva V. A. Beyond Europe and the United States: the wide world of judicial review // Comparative Judicial Review. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018. S. 318–336.
19. 19. Debaenst B. An Introduction to Belgian Legal Culture // Handbook on Legal Cultures: A Selection of the World’s Legal Cultures. Cham: Springer Publishing, 2023. S. 107–144.
20. 20. de Jaegere J. Judicial review and strategic behaviour: an empirical case law analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2019. 368 s.
21. 21. de Visser M. Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2014. 484 s.
22. 22. Farahat A. The German Federal Constitutional Court // Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. S. 279–355.
23. 23. Ferreres Comella V. Constitutional courts and democratic values a European perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. 256 s.
24. 24. Gerkrath J. The constitution of Luxembourg in the context of EU and international law as «Higher Law» // National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law. The Hague: Asser Press, 2019. S. 221-267.
25. 25. Kauper P. Judicial Review of Constitutional Issues in the United States // Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in der Gegenwart. (Internationalen Kolloquium, Heildelberg 1961). Köln – Berlin: C. Heymann's Verlag. S. 568-642.
26. 26. Kommers D., Miller R.The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012. 900 s.
27. 27. Pizzorusso A. Delle Fonti del Diritto. Commentario del Codice Civile, Art. 1–9. Bologna, 1977. S. 15.
28. 28. Pfersmann O. Classifications organocentriques et classifications normocentriques de la justice constitutionnelle en droit comparé // En hommage à Francis Delpérée — Itinéraires d’un constitutionnaliste. Bruxelles/Paris: Bruylant/LGDJ, 2007. S. 1131–1145.
29. 29. Popelier P., Martens L. The Belgian Constitutional Court: Navigating between constitutional rights and consociational politics // Constitutional Review in Western Europe: judicial-legislative relations in comparative perspective. Abingdon: Routledge, 2024. S. 52–76.
30. 30. Rullo L. The Italian Constitutional Court: A powerful political institution // Constitutional Review in Western Europe: judicial-legislative relations in comparative perspective. Abingdon: Routledge, 2024. S. 191–214.
31. 31. Tuleja P. The Polish Constitutional Tribunal // Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 619–672.
32. 32. Tusseau G. Au-delà des «modèles» de justice constitutionnelle, pour un comparatisme pragmatiste // Metodologia della comparaisons. Lo studio dei sistemi giudiziari nel contesto euro-americano. Bologna: Filodiritto Editore, 2014. S. 160–175.
33. 33. Valentini C. Italy: Constitutionally Conforming Interpretation and Judicial Dialogue // Constitutionally Conforming Interpretation: Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023. S. 111–136.
Download file .pdf 351.66 kb