Authors
- Abbud Raul Ratebovich
Annotation
The article is devoted to the urgent problem of the formation and development of the human right to an image as a new right for Russia in the era of rapid digitalization.
The purpose of the study is to substantiate the need to introduce the human right to an image into Russian law based on an analysis of the history of a similar concept of «right of publicity » from US law. The article analyzes the norms of the current civil law of Russia governing the protection of intangible benefits, the doctrine and judicial practice of the United States. The problematic questions in this issue have been identified, and improvement of legislation on intangible benefits has been proposed. It is concluded that the concept from US law can serve as a prototype of the human right to an image for Russian doctrine and legislation, considering the peculiarities of Russian law.
How to link insert
Abbud, R. R. (2024). ON THE QUESTION OF THE GENESIS OF THE HUMAN RIGHT TO AN IMAGE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 4 (56), 87. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9113-2024-456-87-98
References
1.
1. Gallyamova A. A. Bioprinting i pravo cheloveka na cifrovoj obraz: pravovy`e problemy` // Pravo i biznes. 2023. № 2. S. 39–44.
2.
2. Maleina M. N. Lichny`e neimushhestvenny`e prava grazhdan (ponyatie, osushhestvlenie i zashhita): dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Maleina Marina Nikolaevna; Moskovskaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya. M., 1997. 431 s.
3.
3. Matveev A. G., Mart`yanova E. YU. Grazhdansko-pravovaya oxrana golosa cheloveka pri ego sinteze i posleduyushhem ispol`zovanii // Ex Jure. 2023. № 3. S. 118–131. DOI: 10.17072/2619-0648-2023-3-118–131
4.
4. Mograbyan A. S. Vneshnij oblik fizicheskogo licza kak ob``ekt sub``ektivnogo prava na neprikosnovennost` vneshnego oblika // Vestnik VolGU. 2011. Seriya 9. Vy`p. 9. S. 102–106.
5.
5. Puchkov V. O. Osnovny`e problemy` cifrovogo obraza sub``ekta grazhdanskogo prava v civilisticheskoj doktrine i sudebnoj praktike // Arbitrazhny`e spory`. 2020. № 3. S. 143–158.
6.
6. Daniel Gervais and Martin L. Holmes, Fame, Property & Identity: The Purpose and Scope of the Right of Publicity // Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L. J. 2014. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 181–225.
7.
7. Melville B. Nimmer The right of publicity // Law and Contemporary Problems. 1954. Vol. 19, № 2 P. 203–223.
8.
8. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP The Right of Publicity in the AI Age // Firm Memoranda. 2023. P. 1–13.
9.
9. Ragland G. J. The Right of Privacy // Kentucky Law Journal. 1929 Vol. 17, № 2. P. 85–122.
10.
10. Rothman J. E. The right of publicity’s intellectual property turn // Columbia journal of law & the arts. 2019. P. 277–319.
11.
11. Warren Samuel D., Brandeis Louis D. The Right to Privacy // Harvard Law Review. 1890. Vol. 4, № 5. P. 193–220.
12.
12. William L. Prosser Privacy // California Law Review. 1960. Vol. 48, № 3. P. 383–423.