Authors
- Dorskaya Aleksandra Andreyevna Doctor of Law, Professor
- Dorskiy Andrey Yuryevich Doctor in Philosophy, Professor
Annotation
The article explores the experiences of European countries in addressing crisis phenomena related to the regulation of family relations. The purpose of this study is to assess the measures adopted by European states in addressing the public's demand for the implementation of civil marriage and civil divorce, as well as the resolution of conflicts arising from the regulation of marriage and family relations complicated by cross-border factors. In keeping with the stated purpose, the article outlines the following tasks: to uncover the significance and rationales for revisiting the subject of introducing civil marriage from the second half of XIX century to the early XX century; to show the features of the introduction of civil divorce in European countries; to consider international cooperation among European States to streamline approaches to the regulation of family relations. The study concluded that the implementation of the civil form of marriage was linked to revolutionary events or periods of reform. Despite temporary setbacks during restoration periods, these achievements were eventually reinstated. The introduction of civil divorce was significantly
challenging due to the negative perception from both the state and various religious denominations, who viewed it as a threat to the institution of the family. In the early XX century, European nations initiated the process of entering into international treaties with the objective of harmonizing the regulation of family matters and resolving conflict issues.
How to link insert
Dorskaya, A. A. & Dorskiy, A. Y. (2024). THE REGULATORY CRISIS IN FAMILY RELATIONS ACROSS EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: OVERCOMING EXPERIENCES AT THE INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LEVELS FROM THE SECOND HALF OF THE XIX CENTURY TO THE EARLS XX CENTURY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 4 (56), 29. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9113-2024-456-29-40
References
1.
1. Berdnikov I. S. «Brak, rassmatrivaemy`j v svoej prirode i so storony` formy` ego zaklyucheniya» Nikolaya Straxova (Xar`kov, 1893). Kazan`: Tipo-litografiya Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo universiteta, 1896. 22 s.
2.
2. Berdnikov I. S. Vtoraya zametka po voprosu o raskol`nicheskom brake. Kazan`: Tipo-litografiya Imperatorskogo universiteta, 1896. 59 c.
3.
3. Berdnikov I. S. Forma zaklyucheniya braka u evropejskix narodov v ee istoricheskom razvitii. Kazan`: Tipografiya Imperatorskogo universiteta, 1887. 56 s.
4.
4. Vaxromeeva O. B. Grazhdanskij brak v Rossijskoj imperii // Aktual`ny`e problemy` gumanitarny`x i estestvenny`x nauk. 2014. № 1-1. S. 74–76.
5.
5. Vospominaniya sovremennikov o Mixaile Nikolaeviche Murav`eve, grafe Vilenskom / otv. red. O. A. Platonov. M.: Institut russkoj civilizacii, 2014. 464 s.
6.
6. Zaozerskij N. A. K voprosu o zlonamerennom ostavlenii odnim suprugom drugogo kak osnovanii rastorzheniya braka (po povodu knigi N. S. Suvorova «Zamechaniya na „Proekt polozhenij o povodax k razvodu“»). Sergiev Posad: Tipografiya Svyato-Troiczkoj Sergievoj lavry`, 1908. 14 s.
7.
7. Krasnozhen M. E. O razvode v Rossii: istoricheskij ocherk. M.: Tovarishhestvo tipo-litografii V. Chicherin,1899. 22 s.
8.
8. Luk`yanovskaya O. V., Poplevin I. V. Vliyanie religii na brachno-semejny`e otnosheniya v Rossii v sredine XIX – nachale XX vv. // Zhurnal istoricheskix issledovanij. 2023. T. 8, № 2. S. 21–26.
9.
9. Mun V. A. Osobennosti regulirovaniya brachno-semejny`x otnoshenij v dorevolyucionnoj Rossii // Pravo, istoriya, pedagogika i sovremennost`: sbornik statej V Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Penza: Penzenskij gosudarstvenny`j universitet, 2024. S. 166–170.
10.
10. Ostroumov M. A. Vvedenie v Pravoslavnoe cerkovnoe pravo. Xar`kov: Tipografiya gubernskogo pravleniya, 1893. T. 1. 672 s.
11.
11. Pashencev D. A. Dve modeli pravovogo regulirovaniya semejny`x otnoshenij: dorevolyucionny`j i sovetskij opy`t // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Yurisprudenciya». 2019. № 3. S. 60–67.
12.
12. Safronova S. S. Gaagskie konvencii o zaklyuchenii i prekrashhenii braka // Aktual`ny` e problemy` politiki i prava: mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchny`x statej. Penza: Informacionno-izdatel`skij centr PGU, 2003. Vy`p. 6. S. 163–169.
13.
13. Smirnov A. I. Xristianizaciya prava v Vizantijskoj imperii (na primere E`klogi) // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2019. № 3 (24). S. 51–60.
14.
14. Suvorov N. S. Grazhdanskij brak [E`lektronny`j resurs]. SPb.: Tipografiya YA. Kantorovich,
1896. 153 s. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Nikolaj_Suvorov/grazhdanskij-brak/
(data obrashheniya: 21.09.2024).
15.
15. Suvorov N. S. Zamechaniya na «Proekt polozheniya o povodax k razvodu, sostavlenny` j Osoby`m soveshhaniem pri Svyatejshem Sinode». M.: Pech. A. I. Snegirevoj, 1908. 55 s.
16.
16. Tarusina N. N. Brak po rossijskomu semejnomu pravu. Yaroslavl`: Yaroslavskij gosudarstvenny`j universitet im. P. G. Demidova, 2007.
17.
17. Telepina N. M., Telepina N. A. K voprosu o stanovlenii instituta grazhdanskogo braka: sravnitel`no-pravovoj obzor pravovogo regulirovaniya brachno-semejny`x otnoshenij v Rossii i stranax Zapadnoj Evropy` v konce XIX veka // Vestnik GUU. 2014. № 15. S. 313–318.
18.
18. Fedosova E`. P. Graf M. N. Murav`ev-Vilenskij (1796–1866): zhizn` na sluzhbe imperii. M.: Institut rossijskoj istorii RAN, 2015. 255 s.
19.
19. Xabibullina Yu. Z. Istoricheskie usloviya razvitiya semejnogo prava v Rossijskoj imperii vo vtoroj polovine XIX – nachale XX vekov // Tendencii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2018. № 44-3. S. 63–66.
20.
20. Chibirikova S. N. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie zaklyucheniya i rastorzheniya braka // Byulleten` nauki i praktiki / Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2019. T. 5, № 2. S. 263–267.