Authors
- Vasilyev Ilya Alexandrovich Candidate of Law, Associate Professor
Annotation
Legal coercion in sports law is traditionally associated with sports, sometimes called disciplinary liability. This judgment is true, but it reflects only the most obvious and popular part of the coercion toolkit for sports organizations. Today, the regulatory norms of sports federations and the law enforcement practice of sports justice allow us to confidently state the use of other measures that are not reducible to sanctions. One example is the so — called administrative measures, which are aimed at exercising control over sports subjects at a certain point in the life cycle of the organization and holding of a competition or the functioning of a sports organization. Another example is preventive and remedial measures that do not differ in regulatory certainty in the regulations of sports federations, hiding under the guise of sports sanctions. The present study is aimed at carrying out for the first time a classification of coercive measures used in modern sports law. The main criterion is the purpose of the measure as its use to achieve the necessary effect in the legal impact on sports subjects.
References
1.
1. Vasil`ev I. A., Sheveleva N. A. Otstraneniya rossijskix sportivny`x federacij i sportsmenov: nepravomerny`e ultima ratio // Zakon. 2022. № 8. S. 60–70.
2.
2. Vasil`ev I. A., Sheveleva N. A., Vetrova E. G. Administrativnaya mera UEFA po otstraneniyu kluba ot uchastiya v sorevnovanii za manipulirovanie rezul`tatom: yuridicheskaya priroda i osobennosti primeneniya // Zakon. 2020. № 8. S. 31–43.
3.
3. Doroxin V. S., Polyakov A. V. O nekotory`x idejny`x istochnikax teorii maksimizacii bogatstva Richarda Poznera: Adam Smit i Ieremiya Bentam // Aktual`ny`e problemy` e`konomiki i prava. 2020. T. 14, № 4. S. 683–696.
4.
4. Kuri X., Il`chenko O. Yu. E`ffektivnost` nakazaniya: rezul`taty` mezhdunarodny`x issledovanij // Aktual`ny`e problemy` e`konomiki i prava. 2013. № 2. S. 240–256.
5.
5. Lipinskij D. A. Vzaimodejstvie funkcij grazhdansko-pravovoj otvetstvennosti v preduprezhdenii pravonarushenij: obshheteoreticheskij aspekt // Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal. 2019. T. 13, № 1. S. 30–40.
6.
6. Lipinskij D. A., Evdokimov K. N. Regulyativnaya funkciya ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti: ponyatie, struktura i vzaimosvyaz` s preduprezhdeniem prestupnosti // Vserossijskij kriminologicheskij zhurnal. 2017. T. 11, № 3. S. 520–530.
7.
7. Pechegin D. A. Diskussiya po itogam oznakomleniya s soderzhaniem stat`i V. V. Xilyuty` «Nakazanie i ugolovno-pravovoe vozdejstvie: poisk optimal`noj modeli protivodejstviya prestupnosti» // Rossijskij zhurnal pravovy`x issledovanij. 2019. T. 6, № 3 (20). S. 148–152.
8.
8. Pudovochkin Yu. E. Koncept «risk» i problemy` ugolovno-pravovoj nauki // Nauchny` j vestnik Omskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2020. T. 26, № 4 (79). S. 58–67.
9.
9. Stepashin V. M. Soderzhanie principa e`konomii repressii // Lex russica (Russkij zakon). 2017. № 11 (132). S. 24–37.
10.
10. Vasilyev I. A., Vetrova E. G. A new “Catch 22”: “protective measures”, “preventive measures” and “sports sanctions” versus Russian athletes // Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law. 2023. T. 14, № 2. P. 510–520. (In English).
11.
11. Dorskaia A. A., Dorskii A. Yu. Co-regulation as a way to improve the effectiveness of legal regulation in sports // Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law. 2021. T. 12, № 2. P. 263–275. (In English).
12.
12. Emilio García Silvero. The match-fixing eligibility criteria in UEFA competitions: an overview of CAS case law // Bulletin TAS. CAS Bulletin. 2018/1 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Bulletin_2018_01.pdf. P. 6–21.