Authors
- Emelina Lyudmila Anatolyevna Candidate of Law
- Yavorsky Sergey Anatolyevich
Annotation
The article raises the problem of abuse by debtor spouses of the possibilities of the prenuptial agreement in relation to creditors. The authors of the article study the judicial practice of disputable relationships and come to the conclusion that the prenuptial agreement should protect the rights of spouses to personal liability for loans. However, the subjective rights of one party should not infringe on the rights of the other and thus create a crisis in the legal sphere. The authors of the study are convinced that the reform of this norm cannot but affect such presumptions as the consent of the spouse to the receipt of the loan by the second spouse, the community of debts and income of the spouses, as well as the very regime of community of property of the spouses. In addition, the abuse of the right by debtor spouses to infringe the rights of creditors through the application of the terms of the marriage contract should be reduced to the maximum extent possible by the legislator improving the necessary norms and additions to paragraph 1 of Article 46 of the Family Code.
How to link insert
Emelina, L. A. & Yavorsky, S. A. (2024). THE CONSEQUENCES OF USING A PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT TO HIDE FINANCIAL ASSETS FROM CREDITORS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (55),
References
1.
1. Bespalov Yu. F. Rassmotrenie i razreshenie sporov o razdele obshhego imushhestva suprugov (by`vshix suprugov): nekotory`e teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty` // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». 2017. № 3. S. 9–18.
2.
2. Dorskaya A. A. Krizisy` prava i razvitie prav cheloveka: problema sootnosheniya ponyatij // Pravo i prava cheloveka v sovremennom mire: tendencii, riski, perspektivy` razvitiya: materialy` Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvyashhennoj pamyati professora F. M. Rudinskogo (Moskva, 23 aprelya 2020 g.). Saratov: Saratovskij istochnik, 2020. S. 84–88.
3.
3. Emelina L. A. Vliyanie semejnogo zakonodatel`stva na regulirovanie semejnogo biznesa za rubezhom // Semejny`j biznes & LegalTech: nauchny`e resheniya dlya professional` noj predprinimatel`skoj deyatel`nosti: monografiya / otv. red.: I. V. Ershova, A. N. Levushkin. M.: Prospekt, 2023. S. 525–536.
4.
4. Emelina L. A. Voprosy` primeneniya brachnogo dogovora v otnoshenii biznesa odnogo iz suprugov // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». 2018. № 2. S. 6–21.
5.
5. Pashencev D. A. Konstruktivizm v sovremennoj yuridicheskoj nauke // Vestnik MGPU. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2022. № 1 (45). S. 16–22.
6.
6. Poltavecz E. M., Severuxin V. A. Predely` realizacii sub``ektivny`x prav // Problemy` realizacii prav cheloveka i grazhdanina v usloviyax sovremenny`x social`ny`x transformacij: materialy` Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashhennoj pamyati professora F. M. Rudinskogo (Moskva, 21 aprelya 2022 g.) / pod obshh. red. D. A. Pashenceva, N. M. Ladnushkinoj. Saratov: Saratovskij istochnik, 2022. S. 42–45.
7.
7. Pshonina M. N., Efimova O. V. Osushhestvlenie imushhestvenny`x pravootnosheniya suprugov pri brakorazvodnom processe // Aktual`ny`e problemy` sovremennogo rossijskogo zakonodatel`stva Rossijskoj Federacii: sb. st. / avt.-sost. O. V. Efimova. Vy`p. 5. M.: Saratovskij istochnik, 2017. S. 58–68.
8.
8. Subbotina E. V. Osobennosti osushhestvleniya prav i ispolneniya obyazannostej v brachno-semejny`x otnosheniyax // Semejnoe i zhilishhnoe pravo. 2012. № 3. S. 34–37.
9.
9. Chegovadze L. A. Zloupotreblenie pravom kak forma grazhdanskogo pravonarusheniya // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2013. № 2. S. 8–11.