Home Releases 2023, №1 (49)

RECOVERY OF A PENALTY UNDER A PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TO MEET STATE AND MUNICIPAL NEEDS

Private Law , UDC: 347 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9113.2023.49.1.08

Authors

  • Nitsevich Vadim Viktorovich
  • Nitsevich Tatyana Valerievna
  • Nicevich Viktor Frantsevich Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor

Annotation

The problem raised by the authors is of scientific and practical importance from the point of view of public law, obligations of state, municipal bodies, legal entities and their officials (employees) in the execution of the Federal Law dated 05.04.2013 No. 44-FZ “On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, work, services to meet state and municipal needs”. The authors, analyzing many points of view on such issues as the possibility and necessity of imposing fines and, especially, penalties, make an attempt to justify that violation of the terms of the contract should entail the obligation to pay a penalty (fine and penalties) on the part of the executors of state (municipal) contracts, and namely, suppliers. The norms contained in the current legislation do not give a clear understanding of whether, in this case, the imposition of a penalty, in the form of a fine and late charges, is an obligation or a right. At the same time, this position does not have a definite regulation by the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

How to link insert

Nitsevich, V. V., Nitsevich, T. V. & Nicevich, V. F. (2023). RECOVERY OF A PENALTY UNDER A PROCUREMENT CONTRACT TO MEET STATE AND MUNICIPAL NEEDS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023, №1 (49), 83. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2023.49.1.08
References
1. 1. Vitryanskij V. V. Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij k chasti pervoj Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii dlya predprinimatelej. 2-e izd. M.: Spark; Xozyajstvo i pravo, 1999. S. 736.
2. 2. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 4 t. / otv. red. E A. Suxanov. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Status, 2020. S. 720.
3. 3. Misak A. Yu. Dozhdalis`: pervy`j obzor sudebnoj praktiki po voprosam, svyazanny`m s primeneniem Federal`nogo Zakona «O zakupkax tovarov, rabot, uslug otdel`ny`mi vidami yuridicheskix licz» // Vestnik akademii prava i upravleniya. 2018. № 3 (52). S. 88–93.
4. 4. O kontraktnoj sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvenny` x i municipal`ny`x nuzhd. Federal`ny`j zakon № 44-FZ. M.: Prospekt, 2021. 352 s.
5. 5. Ry`bakova I. Ya. Problemy` primeneniya mer otvetstvennosti storon za nenadlezhashhee ispolnenie gosudarstvenny`x i municipal`ny`x kontraktov // Srednerusskij vestnik obshhestvenny`x nauk. 2015. № 3. T. 10. S. 125–133.
6. 6. Tasalov F. A. Vzy`skanie neustojki v ramkax zakonodatel`stva RF o kontraktnoj sisteme v sfere zakupok // Aktual`ny`e problemy` rossijskogo prava. 2017. № 7 (80). S. 73–82.
7. 7. Yuzefovich Zh. Yu., Dulatova K. A. Otvetstvennost` storon za neispolnenie ili nenadlezhashhee ispolnenie obyazatel`stv po kontraktu v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot i uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvenny`x i municipal`ny`x nuzhd // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2016. № 1. S. 70–73.
Download file .pdf 247.77 kb