Home Releases 2022, №1 (45)

THE CONCEPTS OF EVIDENCE AND PROVING NEED REVIEWING

Public Law , UDC: 343.98 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9113.2022.45.1.08

Authors

  • Churilov Sergey Nikiforovich Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor

Annotation

The article raises the question of revising the main provisions in the theory of evidence and criminal proceedings such as the concepts of evidence and proof. According to the author, evidence should not be called “any information”, as indicated in part 1 of Art. 74 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, but the evidentiary facts contained in the protocols of investigative and judicial actions, the conclusions and testimony of an expert (specialist), and other documents. It is proposed to abandon the term “collecting evidence”, because the result of the reflection of the event under study is not evidence but various traces of this event. Evidence according to the author does not comprise collecting, verification and evaluation of evidence but their formation and use in order to establish the circumstances which the correct resolution of the criminal case depends on.

How to link insert

Churilov, S. N. (2022). THE CONCEPTS OF EVIDENCE AND PROVING NEED REVIEWING Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022, №1 (45), 83. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2022.45.1.08
References
1. 1. Bezlepkin B. T. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-processual`nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejny`j). 15-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2021. 640 s.
2. 2. Vlasov S. V. Apologiya novoj teorii ugolovno-processual`ny`x dokazatel`stv // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. 2016. № 1 (33). S. 99–104.
3. 3. Doktrinal`naya model` ugolovno-processual`nogo prava Rossijskoj Federacii i kommentarij k nej / pod red. A. S. Aleksandrova. M.: Yurlitinform, 2015. 304 s.
4. 4. Petruxin I. L. Vstupitel`naya stat`ya k pervomu izdaniyu // Shejfer S. A. Dokazatel` stva i dokazy`vanie po ugolovny`m delam: problemy` teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. 2-e izd. ispr. i dop. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2020. S. 5–12.
5. 5. Stel`max V. Yu. Sushhnost` formirovaniya dokazatel`stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Ural`skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2016. № 4. S. 69–73.
6. 6. Xmel`niczkaya T. V. Problema formirovaniya dokazatel`stv v xode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2016. 213 s.
7. 7. Churilov S. N. Operirovanie dokazatel`stvami kak e`lement dokazy`vaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2021. № 3 (43) S. 63–70.
8. 8. Churilov S. N. O nekotory`x sporny`x polozheniyax v teorii dokazatel`stv // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2021. № 1 (41). S. 87–93.
9. 9. Shejfer S. A. Dokazatel`stva i dokazy`vanie po ugolovny`m delam: problemy` teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. 2-e izd. ispr. i dop. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2020. 240 s.
Download file .pdf 210.4 kb