Home → Releases → 2020, №2 (38) →

Evidence Theory in Anglo-American Legal Doctrine

Public Law , UDC: 343.14 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9113.2020.38.2.07

Authors

  • Kurbanov Aiden Shamiloglu Candidate of Law, Assistant Professor of the Department of Administration of Justice in the Courts of General Jurisdiction, Russian State Social University. E-mail: a.kurbanov@mail.ru
Tags:
Anglo-american law , Civil procedure , Concept , Court , Doctrine , Evidence , Legislation.

How to link insert

Kurbanov, A. S. (2020). Evidence Theory in Anglo-American Legal Doctrine Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2020, №2 (38), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2020.38.2.07
References
1. Kaftajlova E. V., Ruchkin O. Yu., Truncevskij Yu. V. Reorganizaciya yuridicheskix licz (pravovy'e osnovy'): nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Yurist, 2010. 120 s.
2. Prava cheloveka v usloviyax globalizacii i ix zashhita v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave (mezhdisciplinarnoe issledovanie): kollektivnaya monografiya: v 2 kn. Kn. I. / pod red. A. I. Krivenkogo. M.: MGPU, 2016. 212 s.
3. Savvich N. E., Truncevskij Yu. V. E'kologicheskoe pravo: uchebnoe posobie. M.: YurInfoR, 2001. 302 s.
4. Anderson T., Schum D. and Twining W. Analysis of Evidence. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 401 p.
5. Bello D., Verheij B. Artif Intell Law (2019). URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09253-0 (data obrashheniya: 02.12.2019).
6. Bentham J. A Treatise on Judicial Evidence / M. Dumont (ed.), London: Paget, 1825. 366 p.
7. Cohen L. The Role of Evidential Weight in Criminal Proof // Boston University Law Review. 1986. № 66. P. 635-649.
8. Damaska M. Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Proce­dure: A Comparative Study // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 1973. Vol. 121 (3). P. 507-589.
9. Damaska M. Evidence Law Adrift. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997. 176 p.
10. Damaska M. Presentation of Evidence and Factfinding Precision // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 1975. Vol. 123 (3). P. 1083-1106.
11. Damaska M. Propensity Evidence in Continental Legal Systems // Chicago Kent Law Review. 1994. Vol. 70 (6). P. 55-67.
12. Damaska M. The Jury and the Law of Evidence: Real and Imagined Interconnec­tions // Law, Probability and Risk. 2006. № 5. P. 255-265.
13. Damaska M. Of Hearsay and Its Analogues // Minnesota Law Review. 1992. Vol. 76. P. 425-458.
14. Ducharme L. Precis de la prevue. 5d ed. Montreal: Bleue, Wilson & Lafleur, 1996. 489 p.
15. Ducharme L. L'administration de la prevue. 3d ed. Montreal: Bleue, Wilson & Lafleur, 2001. 469 p.
16. Ho, Hock Lai. The Legal Concept of Evidence. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Phi­losophy (Winter 2015 Edition) / Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/evidence-legal/ (data obrashheniya: 02.12.2019).
17. Houle & Clayton Peterson. Essay on the many faces of truth in the law of evidence France, 2016. URL: https://ciaj-icaj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/844.pdf (data obrashhe­niya: 02.12.2019).
18. Keynes J. A Treatise on Probability. London: MacMillan, 1921. URL: https://philpa-pers.org/rec/KEYATO (дата обращения: 02.12.2019).
19. Lavoie С. L'expert: son rapport et son temoignage. Cowansville: Editions Yvon Blais, 2007. 150 p.
20. Martins J. M. A System for Explaining and Justifying Beliefs about Facts in Civil Trials. Artificial Intelligence & Law, 2019. URL: https://www.springerprofessional.de/a-sys-tem-of-communication-rules-for-justifying-and-explaining-be/16528628 (data obrashhe­niya: 02.12.2019).
21. Paciocco D., Stuesser L. The Law of Evidence. Concord: Irwin Law, 1996. 682 p.
22. Schwartz D.S. A Foundation Theory of Evidence // GEO. L.J. 2011. Vol. 100. P. 95-171.
23. Sopinka J., Sidney N. Lederman & Alan W Bryant, The Law of Evidence in Canada. 4th ed. Markham, Ontario: LexisNexis, 2014. 1468 p.
24. Stephen J. The Indian Evidence Act, with an Introduction on the Principles of Judicial Evidence. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Co, 1872. 182 p.
25. Stephen J. F. A Digest of the Law of Evidence. Macmillan, 1876. 198 p.
26. Thayer J. A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1898. 551 p.
27. Tucker v Oldbury Urban District Council, [1912] 2 KB 317 at 321 (CA), 1912 WL 17524 (Westlaw).
28. Twining W. Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1985. 265 p.
Download file .pdf 262.7 kb