Authors
- Klyuchnikov Andrey Yuryevich A judge in Right-bank district court of Lipetsk, PhD in Law, Assistant Professor, Constitutional and International Law department, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Lipetsk branch. E-mail: andrew19871961@mail.ru
Annotation
The article deals with some issues of the establishment of the Institute for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the European Union, its ransformation
into one of the foundations of a supranational organization functioning . The author draws conclusions about the relationship between supranational and national constitutional and legal competence in this area. The features of the complex impact of two supranational courts such as the EU Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights on the area of protection of human rights in the European Union were studied.
How to link insert
Klyuchnikov, A. Y. (2019). The Role of the European Court of Justice in Setting a pan-European Standard for the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2019, №1 (33), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2019.33.1.04
References
1.
Aleksandrova K.I. Urisdikcionny'e konflikty' v deyatel'nosti Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoria i praktika. 2016. № 10 (142). S. 118-121.
2.
IspolinovA.S. Prisoedinenie Evropejskogo Soyuza k Evropejskoj Konvencii po pravam cheloveka: nastoyatel'naya neobxodimost' ili popy'tka sovmestit' nesovmestimoe // Rossijskoe pravosudie. 2012. № 9. S. 21-36.
3.
Krivova M.V. Rol' Suda ES v formirovanii obshhix principov prava Evropejskix Soobshhestv i Souza i zashhita prav cheloveka i osnovny'x svobod // Rossijskoe predprini-
4.
matel'stvo. 2004. № 1. S. 9-11.
5.
Laptev G.S. Rol' Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v zashhite social'ny'x prav grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya pravo. 2009. № 1 (18). S. 69-71.
6.
Meshheryakova O.M. Osnovny'e principy' zashhity' prav cheloveka v prave Evropej-skogo Souza // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. № 12. 2013. S. 85-89.
7.
Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [2006] 42 EHJRR 1.
8.
Geitling Ruhrkohlen-Verkaufsgesellschaft mbH, Mausegatt Ruhrkohlen-Verkaufge-sellschaft mbH and I. Nold KG v. High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community: joined cases 36, 37, 38/59 and 40/59 [1959] ECR 423.
9.
Hauer v. Land Rheinland-Pfalz: сase 44/79 [1979] EСR 3727.
10.
Hoechst v. Commission: Joined сases 46/87 and 227/88 [1989] EСR 2859.
11.
Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbh v. Einfuhr-und Vorratsstelle fur Getreide und Futtermittel: сase 11/70 [1979] ECR 1125.
12.
M & Co v. Federal Republic of Germany (1990) 65 DR 138.
13.
Nold v. Commission: сase 4/73 [1974] ECR 491.
14.
Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzuge v. Austria: сase C-112/00 [2003] EСR I-5659.
15.
Stauder v. City of Ulm: сase 29/69 [1969] ECR 419.
16.
Stork and Cie v. High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community: сase 1/58 [1958] ECR 17.
17.
Wachauf v. Bundesamt fur Ernahrung und Forstwirtschaft: сase 5/88 [1989] EСR 2609.