Authors
- Krupnova Tatyana Borisovna
Annotation
The purpose of the study indicated in the article is to identify the features of the formation of limits of freedom of expression, which in one way or another determine
the final results of law-making procedures, as well as factors influencing the formation of the internal will of the subject of law-making. Methods of analysis and synthesis were used to achieve the stated goal. Expression of will, freedom of expression and its limits as a category of the theory of lawmaking in this work are investigated using the method of comparative jurisprudence. The article examines the views of scientific schools of jurisprudence on the essence and content of the concept “limits of freedom of expression in lawmaking”. The factors determining the limits of freedom of expression in lawmaking are presented. The role of the target setting in the formation of restrictions on the freedom of law-making subjects in the process of expression of will is determined. The author’s judgment on the determinants of the formation of a measure of such freedom and their content is formulated.
How to link insert
Krupnova, T. B. (2024). LIMITS OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN LAWMAKING: DETERMINANTS OF FORMATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (54), 106. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2024.54.2.11
References
1.
1. Zaloilo M. V. Sovremenny`j zakonodatel`ny`j process: ot pravovy`x tendencij k prognoziruemy`m scenariyam razvitiya // Rossijskij zhurnal pravovy`x issledovanij. 2023. T. 10, № 2. S. 39–48.
2.
2. Kerimov D. A. Metodologiya prava: predmet, funkcii, problemy` filosofii prava. M.: Avanta+, 2001. 560 s.
3.
3. Krupnova T. B. Svoboda voleiz``yavleniya kak kategoriya teorii pravotvorchestva // Pravotvorchestvo v XXI veke: e`volyuciya doktriny` i praktiki (k 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A. S. Pigolkina): sbornik nauchny`x statej / T. Ya. Xabrieva, V. V. Lazarev, V. R. Avxadeev i dr.; otv. red. V. V. Lazarev. M.: IZiSP: Norma: INFRA-M, 2022. S. 112–117.
4.
4. Malaya T. N. Predely` svobody` voleiz``yavleniya zaveshhatelya po rasporyazheniyu zemel`ny`m uchastkom // E`kologicheskoe pravo. 2006. № 4. S. 7–8.
5.
5. Mal`cev G. V. Social`ny`e osnovaniya prava: monografiya / G. V. Mal`cev. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2011. 800 s.
6.
6. Ojgenzixt V. A. Volya i voleiz``yavlenie (ocherki teorii, filosofii i psixologii prava). Dushanbe: Donish, 1983. 256 c.
7.
7. Pashencev D. A. Konstruktivizm v sovremennoj yuridicheskoj nauke // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». 2022. № 1. S. 16–22.
8.
8. Pashencev D. A., Zaloilo M. V., Putilo N. V. Vekovaya istoriya razvitiya nauchnoj shkoly` pravotvorchestva Instituta // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2023. T. 27, № 11. S. 127–139.
9.
9. Pevczova E. A., Pashencev D. A. Pravovaya kul`tura postindustrial`nogo obshhestva: metodologicheskie osnovy` issledovaniya // Moskovskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. 2023. № 3. S. 8–16.
10.
10. Politova I. P. Volya i voleiz``yavlenie: monografiya. M.: Prospekt, 2016. 112 s.
11.
11. Sorokin V. V. Dux prava — fundamental`naya kategoriya yuridicheskoj nauki // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2021. № 12. S. 164–167.
12.
12. Tixomirov Yu. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie: teoriya i praktika. M.: Formula prava, 2010. 398 s.
13.
13. Uznadze D. N. Psixologiya ustanovki. SPb.: Piter, 2001. 416 s.
14.
14. Xabrieva T. Ya. Sovremennoe pravotvorchestvo i zadachi yuridicheskoj nauki // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2015. № 8. S. 5–13.
15.
15. Zezekalo A. Y. “La Trahison des Images”: Intentional discrepancy between individual will and its declaration // Pravovedenie. 2023. T. 67, № 3. S. 305–313.