Authors
- Zarubina Kristina Alexandrovna Candidate of Historical Sciences
- Chapchikov Sergey Yuryevich Doctor of Law, Professor
Annotation
To achieve this goal, comparative legal, formal legal, historical methods, as well as the method of analysis, synthesis and generalization are used. In the work, such normative legal acts as the Pskov Judicial Charter, the Cathedral Code of 1649, the Code on Criminal and Correctional Punishments of 1845 (with subsequent revisions) were studied. It is established that the judicial chambers of the Russian Empire, as well as the Supreme Criminal Court, were engaged in the consideration of cases of a political nature during the period under study. The judicial process was monitored by the ranks of the prosecutor’s supervision. However, the mechanisms of functioning of the institute of criminal proceedings in political cases have not demonstrated their effectiveness, as a result of which there was no suppression of the spread of opposition sentiments in society by legal means.
How to link insert
Zarubina, K. A. & Chapchikov, S. Y. (2024). LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN CASES OF A POLITICAL NATURE IN THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE IN 1864–1917 Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (54), 22. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2024.54.2.02
References
1.
1. Vorobev A. S. Institut gosudarstvennykh prestuplenii v period deistviia Ulozheniia o nakazaniiakh ugolovnykh i ispravitelnykh 1845 g.: problematika opredeleniia ego ramok i soderzhaniia // Aktualnye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2017. № 8 (81). S. 11–16.
2.
2. Goncharov D. IU. Zakonodatelstvo o protivodeistvii prestupnosti: mezhotraslevye vzaimosviazi: monografiia. 2-e izd. M.: Iurait, 2019. 285 s.
3.
3. Zarubina K. A. Sistema gosudarstvennykh prestuplenii v ugolovnom prave Rossii (XIX – nachalo XX vv.) // Evoliutsiia gosudarstva i prava: problemy i perspektivy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov 3-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii s vkliucheniem materialov XI kruglogo stola «Tsennosti i normy pravovoi kultury v Rossii». Kursk, 2021. S. 296–298.
4.
4. Krakovskii K. P. Verkhovnyi ugolovnyi sud v Rossii v pozdneimperskii period // Vestnik iuridicheskogo fakulteta Iuzhnogo federalnogo universiteta. 2014. № 1 (1). S. 33–38.
5.
5. Kuras T. L. Voprosy deiatelnosti sudebnykh palat v Rossiiskoi imperii po rassmotreniiu del o gosudarstvennykh prestupleniiakh // Sibirskii iuridicheskii vestnik. 2007. № 1 (36). S. 12–17.
6.
6. Lure F. M. Politicheskii sysk v Rossii, 1649–1917. M.: Tsentrpoligraf: MiM-Delta, 2006. 396 s.
7.
7. Mishkin V. B. Reglamentatsiia smiagcheniia nakazaniia v normakh Ulozheniia o nakazaniiakh ugolovnykh i ispravitelnykh // Sibirskoe iuridicheskoe obozrenie 2011. № 14. S. 107–109.
8.
8. Rossiiskoe zakonodatelstvo X–XX vv.: v 9 t. T. 4: Zakonodatelstvo perioda stanovleniia absoliutizma / otv. red. A. G. Mankov. M.: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1986. 512 s.
9.
9. Sapunkov A. A. Podsudnost Sudebnykh palat Rossiiskoi imperii po izieiatiiam iz obshchego poriadka ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (politicheskie prestupleniia) // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia «Pravo». 2017. № 1 (50). S. 44–52.